A major regulatory hurdle in the way of Elon Musk’s Starlink project – his ambitious plan to launch broadband services from space – has finally been overcome.
The US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has approved his spaceflight company SpaceX’s application to modify its original approval, which allowed the company to operate 4,425 satellites at an orbital of altitude 1,150 km.
The revised application requested the Commission to let SpaceX reduce the number of its Starlink constellation of satellites to 4,409 and re-position 1,584 of them to a lower orbital altitude of 550 km.
Now that the modification request has got the FCC nod, SpaceX is expected to start launching its internet-beaming, non-geostationary orbit (NGSO) satellites from Florida, sometime next month.
Welcoming the FCC decision, SpaceX president Gwynne Shotwell said: “This approval underscores the FCC’s confidence in SpaceX’s plans to deploy its next-generation satellite constellation and connect people around the world with reliable and affordable broadband service.”
The approval came despite apprehensions raised by companies like OneWeb and Kepler Communications – SpaceX’s competition in space broadband services – arguing that the Starlink satellites would interfere with their own satellites if allowed to fly at a reduced altitude.
However, the Commission overruled their petitions, noting in its approval that the proposed changes did not pose any interference threat to other satellites and that it was in the public interest.
In response to objections raised about collision risks, FCC said that SpaceX had provided the commission a detailed statement, explaining that the Starlink satellites were equipped with propulsion systems and had the maneuverability to avoid collisions.
“We find no reason to defer action on SpaceX’s modification request as requested by certain commenters,” the Commission wrote in clause 22 of the approval.
“Our rules do not prohibit SpaceX’s selection of an orbital regime that is also used by other satellite operators, but SpaceX must provide a detailed discussion of how it will avoid potential collisions,” the approval read.
“SpaceX has done so in this instance. SpaceX has stated that its satellites have propulsion and SpaceX will maintain the ability to maneuver the satellites to avoid collisions.”
Elon Musk’s foray into yet another business frontier got a major boost back in February last year when FCC Chairman Ajit Pai gave his nod of approval to SpaceX’s plan of providing broadband services using space technologies.
Pai urged his fellow commissioners to give their consent to the company’s application, highlighting the space internet technology’s potential to provide broadband services to rural America and remote parts of the country.
He said that innovative technologies were needed to “bridge America’s digital divide,” and that satellite technology could “help reach Americans who live in rural or hard-to-serve places where fiber optic cables and cell towers do not reach.”
“Following careful review of this application by our International Bureau’s excellent satellite engineering experts, I have asked my colleagues to join me in supporting this application and moving to unleash the power of satellite constellations to provide high-speed Internet to rural Americans,” Pai had said in a statement at the time.
“If adopted, it would be the first approval given to an American-based company to provide broadband services using a new generation of low-Earth orbit satellite technologies,” he said.
Pai’s words of encouragement came at the most opportune time for the Hawthorne, California-based company, as it was preparing to launch its first set of prototype satellites, Microsat-2a and Microsat-2b, in about a week’s time.
The prototypes were launched on Feb 22, 2018, atop a Falcon 9 rocket from the Vandenberg Air Force Base in California.
Nicknamed Tintin A and Tintin B for the mission, the satellites ultimately reached an altitude of 1,125 kilometers where they were supposed to the groundwork, or should we say spacework, for the Starlink constellation.
As a matter of fact, the decision to reduce the orbital altitude of 1,584 satellites was based on input provided by the two test satellites.
At the time, Telesat Canada and Kepler Communications, also a Canadian company, were slightly ahead in the race in so far as demo satellites were concerned, both having launched prototypes in January 2018.
While Telesat deployed its 168-kilogram smallsat with the help of an Indian Polar Satellite Launch Vehicle, Kepler launched its smaller Cubesat atop a Chinese Long March 11 carrier rocket.
OneWeb, on the other hand, was supposed to launch its first ten operational satellites in May 2018, bypassing demo launches altogether.
The launch, however, happened on February 27 this year, and instead of ten, the Arlington, Virginia-based company put six satellites into orbit aboard a Soyuz launch vehicle from the Guiana Space Center in Kourou, French Guiana.
According to OneWeb founder Greg Wyler, the company should have its next-gen constellation in place by 2021, ready to provide five times as much speed to consumers at 2.5 Gbps
As for the Starlink constellation, SpaceX is hopeful of making the space broadband service operational by 2025.
In a Thursday tweet (Apr 25), Tesla CEO Elon Musk revealed his company’s plan to launch the RHD version of its latest and, relatively, more affordable electric vehicle, the Tesla Model 3, in the UK next week.
The UK order page goes live “around May 1 or 2,” followed shortly by Japan, Australia, New Zealand and Hong Kong, while deliveries are expected to begin sometime in the latter half of 2019.
Also, if Musk’s tweet is anything to go by, the company is “hoping to cover all of Eastern Europe this year,” as well.
The billionaire entrepreneur did not offer any timelines, though; however, with his penchant for taking to Twitter at the drop of a hat, we can rest assured there’ll be more from him on that.
Meanwhile, keeping in mind Musk’s reputation of over-committing at times, there is always the possibility that the UK launch may not happen as early as he promises.
But again, with Electrek reporting that an RHD version of the Model 3 was spotted on the I-280 in California, last month, it appears his company is ready to meet the deadline, this time around.
As for pricing for the UK market, there hasn’t been a formal announcement, so far, but Musk did say last month that with country-specific taxes & import duties, we can expect a 25% hike on the US price of $35,000, which would mean a starting price of around £33,900 across the Atlantic.
It goes without saying, that with the UK launch and subsequent launches in other RHD countries, Tesla is looking to offset the loss of $702 million ($4.02 per share) it suffered in the first quarter of 2019 – largely, a consequence of low delivery numbers and issues with costs and pricing adjustments.
Although a loss was on the cards, nobody was expecting it to be as huge as it turned out to be, as Kelley Blue Book’s executive publisher Karl Brauer pointed out in an emailed statement, according to Tech Crunch.
“Everyone expected a first-quarter loss for Tesla, but nobody expected it to be this big,” he wrote. “What’s interesting is how there really isn’t a single, substantial factor driving this.”
According to Brauer, the contributing factors include tax rebate loss, increasing competition, and the saturation of the “initial rush” for the Model 3, not to mention competition from within from other Tesla alternatives.
However, he is hopeful that Tesla would somehow ride the tide and see this lean phase through.
“This is the new normal for Tesla,” he told Tech Crunch.
As for Musk, he’s happy to blame the 37 percent revenue loss in QI on the season, saying that people were disinclined to buying cars in winter.
Is he suggesting that all automakers experience a drop in sales revenue during the winter season? Or is it just Tesla cars they don’t like buying in winter?
Musk has, however, said that the company would change its production and delivery strategy to avoid a repeat of Q1.
“We don’t want a situation again like we had in Q1, where essentially, all the cars were arriving to customers worldwide, all at the same time,” Musk said.
“So it just makes sense to plan production according to demand moving forward,” he added.
As for the Model 3 variants being made available in the UK, your guess is as good as mine!
Will the company offer RHD versions of the two new Model 3 variants it announced last year?
In a series of tweets in mid-2018, Musk announced two new variants of the Model 3 – the dual-motor, all-wheel drive (AWD) Model 3 and the Performance version, which Musk said was capable of zero to 60mph in just 3.5 seconds
While the single motor rear-wheel-drive base model option remains, US buyers can opt for an upgraded version at an additional $5,000, which would not only give them AWD, but also an improved range of 310 miles and a zero to 60mph time of 4.5 seconds, with a top speed of 140mph.
To put that in perspective, the base Model 3 has a maximum range of 220 miles and its stationary to sixty miles per hour time is 5.6 seconds.
The $78,000 Performance version is not only good enough to give the BMW M3 a run for its money – in terms of speed and handling – but it can also “beat anything in its class on the track,” claims Musk – a tall claim, indeed, considering the fact that the M3 is quite a gladiator in the sports sedan arena.
As mentioned, the Performance is capable of zero to sixty in a mere 3.5 seconds, in addition to having a top speed of 155 mph, with a maximum range of 310 miles on a fully juiced-up battery.
The two-motor configuration in the AWD Model 3, including Performance, is conceptualized along the lines of the Model S, with the front motor optimized for range and the one on the back built for power.
Musk claims the car is capable of safely taking you to your destination on any one engine, should the other break down.
If you don’t already know, the all-wheel-drive system in an electric vehicle works differently from that of a petrol or a diesel car where the front and back axles are mechanically connected via a driveshaft so that power is transferred from a single source to all four wheels.
Tesla makes the Model 3 an all-wheel drive by putting another motor up front to power the front wheels, which in effect means that the only connection between the two axles is the surface it drives on, referred to as “through-the-road” system.
Emperor penguin colonies have thrived in Antarctica since time immemorial, as an abundance of sturdy patches of sea-ice serves as ideal breeding grounds for this tallest and heaviest of all living penguin species.
One such colony was in Halley Bay, on the edge of the Brunt Ice Shelf in the Weddell Sea, where, on an average, some 14,000 to 25,000 breeding pairs flocked every year to breed and raise their fledglings until they were able to fend for themselves.
The colony was the world’s second-largest, representing 5 to 9 percent of the global population of these flightless beauties.
However, thousands of emperor penguin chicks were lost overnight, in 2016, when the sea-ice they were being raised on collapsed under the onslaught of a severe storm.
The hapless hatchlings drowned in the freezing waters of the Weddell Sea, as their feathers were not developed-enough for swimming.
The mass drowning of the little emperors was first spotted and reported by British Antarctic Survey (BAS) scientists, Dr. Peter Fretwell and Dr. Phil Trathan, who noticed the missing Halley Bay colony while studying satellite images.
The species took a massive hit that fateful day, but what’s even more disturbing is that adult emperors have not returned to the breeding site ever since – probably due to the fact that a huge iceberg is predicted to disrupt the site, anyways.
Another reason that has kept the birds away from the spot is the fact that the sea-ice that broke off from the side of the sturdier Brunt shelf never really formed properly to support breeding.
Dr. Fretwell – who is the lead author of the paper entitled, “Emperors on thin ice: three years of breeding failure at Halley Bay,” published in the journal Antarctic Science, said:
“We have been tracking the population of this, and other colonies in the region, for the last decade using very high resolution satellite imagery.
“These images have clearly shown the catastrophic breeding failure at this site over the last three years.
“Our specialized satellite image analysis can detect individuals and penguin huddles, so we can estimate the population based on the known density of the groups to give reliable estimate of colony size.”
Being the tallest and heaviest of all extant penguin species, emperor populations as large as the doomed Halley Bay colony need strong and firm sea-ice under their feet – strong enough to withstand the forces of nature and last until their babies have developed the right feathers for swimming.
The length of time we’re looking at is about nine months, as the birds arrive in April and stay until their offspring fledge in December; that’s how long the sea-ice needs to stay colony-worthy.
If, for some reason, the sea-ice breaks up too soon, then a repeat of what happened in 2016 is a foregone conclusion.
Here’s how Dr. Fretwell explained the situation:
“The sea-ice that’s formed since 2016 hasn’t been as strong. Storm events that occur in October and November will now blow it out early. So there’s been some sort of regime change. Sea-ice that was previously stable and reliable is now just untenable.”
However, all is not lost, as a majority of the breeding pairs that lost their chicks in 2016, have moved to safer breeding sites across the waters of the Weddell, with one colony near the Dawson-Lambton Glacier witnessing a “ more than tenfold increase in penguin numbers,” say the authors.
They have, however, not been able to explain why the sea-ice did not redevelop on the Brunt Shelf’s edge; they have no reason or evidence to attribute this to climate change or to anomalies in atmospheric and oceanic conditions in the Brunt Shelf region.
“It is impossible to say whether the changes in sea-ice conditions at Halley Bay are specifically related to climate change, but such a complete failure to breed successfully is unprecedented at this site,” said Dr. Trathan.
That said, Dr. Trathan believes that global warming will impact the continent’s, and indeed the world’s, emperor penguin populations, in the long run, as strong sea-ice will become increasingly hard to come by in warmer waters.
If computer models of the effects of global warming are anything to go by, we could well be looking at a 50 to 70 percent depletion in the world’s emperor population by the end of this century.
“Even taking into account levels of ecological uncertainty, published models suggest that emperor penguins numbers are set to fall dramatically, losing 50-70 percent of their numbers before the end of this century as sea-ice conditions change as a result of climate change,” Trathan said.
“They’re an important part of the food web; they’re what we call a mesopredator. They’re both prey for animals like leopard seals but they also prey themselves on fish and krill species. So, they do play an important role in the ecosystem,” Dr. Michelle LaRue, an ecologist at the University of Canterbury in New Zealand, told BBC News.
“What’s interesting for me is not that colonies move or that we can have major breeding failures – we know that. It’s that we are talking here about the deep embayment of the Weddell Sea, which is potentially one of the climate change refugia for those cold-adapted species like emperor penguins,” Dr. Trathan said.
“And so if we see major disturbances in these refugia – where we haven’t previously seen changes in 60 years – that’s an important signal,” he added
A team of researchers led by Dr. Edward Chang at the University of California in San Francisco has developed a ‘brain decoder’ – a kind of mind-reading device that effectively translates your neural activity into recognizable speech, 75% of the time.
The study entitled ‘Speech synthesis from neural decoding of spoken sentences,’ published Wednesday (April 24) in the journal Nature, involved five epileptic volunteers, including four women and one man awaiting neurosurgery for their condition.
The patients had temporary electrodes implanted on their brain surface as a pre-surgery procedure to help identify and map the areas of the brain responsible for their affliction.
For the study, additional sensors were attached to the lips, tongue, and teeth to monitor their movements as the volunteers were made to read out hundreds of sentences, mostly passages from children’s classics like Sleeping Beauty, Alice in Wonderland, and The Frog Prince.
Electrical activity in the brains related to their vocal tract movement during the reading exercise was decoded and fed to a specially programmed computer system to produce intelligible sentences.
In humans, the vocal tract comprises the oral cavity, which includes the lips, inner cheeks, tongue, upper and lower gums, floor and roof of the mouth, and the small area behind the wisdom teeth, in addition to the nasal cavity, larynx, and the pharynx – all of which work in near-perfect harmony to produce intelligible sentences when we talk.
Dr. Chang’s team was able to equate the neural signals responsible for the movement of each of the vocal tract components with the participants’ speech.
The decoded neural activity was then converted into synthesized language with the help of a neural network linked to a voice synthesizer.
“Recurrent neural networks first decoded directly recorded cortical activity into representations of articulatory movement, and then transformed these representations into speech acoustics,” wrote the authors of the study.
To put it as simply as possible, it was, basically, a two-step process that involved translating neural activity into vocal movements and then transforming those movements into speech.
Although the reproduced speech sounds pretty much, well, synthetic, it is remarkably intelligible.
Also, considering that this is just the beginning, we can expect to see enhanced speech quality as the technology is further researched and fine-tuned in times to come.
This brief video clip will let you know exactly what we’re talking about here.
What’s amazing is that not only did the breakthrough decoder transform sentences that were read aloud, but it was also able to translate silently mimed sentences into audible speech.
In order to determine the recognizability of the decoded speech, hundreds of volunteers were asked to listen to 101 synthesized sentences and transcribe what they heard.
The results – as varied as they turned out to be – were nevertheless encouraging enough to warrant further research of the technology, as it has the potential to improve the quality of life of hundreds of thousands of people suffering from speech impairment due to conditions such as paralysis, ALS (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis ), throat cancer and Parkinson’s disease.
“Of the 101 synthesized trials, at least one listener was able to provide a perfect transcription for 82 sentences with a 25-word pool and 60 sentences with a 50-word pool,” wrote the authors, adding that the findings “may be an important next step in realizing speech restoration for patients with paralysis.”
Conventional speech-synthesizing technology in use today involves interpreting how speech sounds are represented in the brains – a tedious, time-consuming process that, at best, translates about eight words per minute; far slower than the 100-150 words per minute that natural speech is capable of.
The new technology has the potential to overcome these limitations and make near-normal conversation a reality, hopefully, in the not too distant future.
Dr. Chang’s team followed a different route, targeting those areas of the brain that send signals to the various vocal tract components, discussed earlier, in order for them to move in perfect unison, thereby enabling speech.
“For the first time … we can generate entire spoken sentences based on an individual’s brain activity,” said Chang.
“This is an exhilarating proof of principle that, with technology that is already within reach, we should be able to build a device that is clinically viable in patients with speech loss,” added the lead author of the paper.
Kate Watkins, a cognitive neuroscience professor at the University of Oxford, was quoted by The Guardian as saying that the research was a “huge advance” that could prove to be “really important for providing people who have no means of producing language with a device that could deliver that for them.”
“The brain is the most efficient machine that has evolved over millennia, and speech is one of the hallmarks of behavior of humans that sets us apart from even all the non-human primates,” Gopala Anumanchipalli, one of the co-authors of the study. was quoted by National Geographic as saying.
“And we take it for granted—we don’t even realize how complex this motor behavior is,” Anumanchipalli said.
In an accompanying News and Views article in the journal Nature, Yahia H. Ali and Chethan Pandarinath from Emory University, Atlanta, US, have expressed hope that continued research will go a long way in helping people with speech issues “regain the ability to freely speak their minds and reconnect with the world around them.”
While there’s still a lot of work left to be done before the technology can be perfected, it’s good to know that we’re headed in the right direction.
Solar energy is
radiant heat and light from the Sun. It is an important source of renewable
energy. There are two types of these technologies called active solar or
passive solar. The difference is how they catch and share solar energy versus
how they catch and turn it into solar power.
What is Renewable Energy?
Renewable energy is energy generated from natural resources which are renewable (naturally replenished). The United States currently relies on coal, oil, and natural gas for its energy. Fossil fuels are non-renewable. They draw on finite resources that will dwindle. They are becoming too expensive or too environmentally damaging to retrieve. In contrast, there are many types of renewable energy resources. Solar and wind energy are constantly replenished and will never run out.
Most renewable energy comes either directly or indirectly from the sun. Sunlight is our solar energy. The sun’s heat also drives the winds, captured with wind turbines. Then, the winds and the sun’s heat cause water to evaporate. Hydroelectric power is when this water vapor turns into rain or snow. Then, flows downhill into rivers or streams. Sunlight also causes plants to grow. The organic matter that makes up those plants is known as biomass. Biomass produces electricity, transportation fuels, or chemicals. Bioenergy is the name for using these. Hydrogen is another alternative. Once separated from another element, it is burned as a fuel or converted into electricity. It’s the most abundant element on the Earth. But it doesn’t occur naturally as a gas. Not all renewable energy resources come from the sun. Geothermal energy uses the Earth’s internal heat for a variety of uses. These include electric power production and the heating and cooling of buildings. The energy of the ocean’s tides come from the gravitational pull of the moon and the sun upon the Earth. This is tidal energy. Ocean energy comes from many sources. The ocean waves, from tides and winds. The temperature difference between surface and ocean depths. All these forms of ocean energy can be used to produce electricity.
Why is renewable energy important?
Renewable energy is
important because of the benefits it provides. The main benefits are as
technologies are clean sources of energy. They have a much lower environmental
impact than conventional energy technologies.
It is energy for our
children’s children’s children.
Renewable energy will
not run out. Ever. Other sources of energy are finite and will someday be gone.
Jobs and the Economy
Most renewable energy
investments spend on materials and workmanship. To build and maintain the
facilities, rather than on costly energy imports. Renewable energy investments
are usually spent within the United States. Mostly in the same state, and often
in the same town. In doing so energy dollars stay home to create jobs. It also
fuels local economies, rather than going overseas.
energy technologies built in the United States are being sold overseas. This
also provides a boost to the U.S. trade deficit.
In the early 1970s, the U.S. faced oil supply disruptions. Since then, the U.S. has increased its dependence on foreign oil supplies instead of decreasing it. This increased dependence impacts more than our national energy policy.
What are the types of Solar Energy?
Passive solar is the
name for technologies that put buildings facing the Sun. They will find and use
special materials that can scatter light. They will also have designs that help
the airflow without any blockages.
Active solar uses special systems like solar panels also known as photovoltaic (PV) systems. Also, concentrated solar power (CSP) and solar water heating to save the energy.
What are the most common uses of
The two most common
uses of solar energy are Solar Thermal and Solar Photovoltaic:
Thermal systems convert sunlight into thermal energy also known as heat. Most
solar thermal systems use solar energy for space heating or to heat water, such
as in a solar hot water system. The most common way solar energy is being used
today by homeowners in America is by
solar hot water systems. The heat from these systems can make steam. By using
steam turbines, the steam can generate electricity.
Solar PV systems are systems that can convert sunlight into electricity. These systems use PV cells to do so. The more common term for PV cells is solar cells. Solar cells exist on rooftops,
building and even vehicles have them integrated. Power plants have them installed scaled to a megawatt size.
History of Solar Energy
Albert Einstein wrote
a paper in 1905 on the photoelectric
effect. Titled: “On a Heuristic Viewpoint Concerning the Production and
Transformation of Light”. This paper on the photovoltaic effect started to
attract scientific attention.
worked on silicon semiconductors in the 1950’s. They discovered silicon had
photoelectric properties. This helped to develop a silicon cell with 6%
efficiency. Early satellites were the primary use for these first solar cells.
effect” is the ability of sunlight to excite the flow of electrons
(electricity). It was first discovered more than 175 years ago.
Here is a summary of
the first 175 years of humans discovery and use of photovoltaic technology:
1839 – Nineteen-year-old
French physicist Alexandre Edmond Becquerel observes a physical phenomenon.
Discovering light-electricity conversion. While experimenting with metal
electrodes and electrolyte.
1883 – American
inventor Charles Fritts describes the first solar cells made from selenium
1888 – First
US patent for “solar cell” received by Edward Weston.
1901 – US
patent for “method of utilizing, and
apparatus for the use of, radiant energy” received by Nikola Tesla.
1905 – Albert
Einstein publishes a paper on the theory behind the “photoelectric effect”. The same year he published the “theory of
1916 – Robert Millikan experimented Einstein’s theory on the photoelectric effect.
1922 – Albert
Einstein wins Nobel Prize for 1905 paper on the photoelectric effect.
1954 – Bell
Labs exhibits first high-power silicon PV cell. The same year The New York Times forecasts solar cells will lead to a
source of “limitless energy of the sun”.
1963 – Japan
installs a 242-watt PV array on a lighthouse, the world’s largest array at that
time. Sharp Corporation produces a
viable photovoltaic module of silicon solar cells.
1966 – NASA
launches Orbiting Astronomical Observatory with a 1-kilowatt PV array.
The 1970s – Research drives
PV costs down 80%. Reduced costs of offshore navigation warning lights and
horns lighthouses. Also helped railroad crossings and remote use where utility grid connections are too costly.
1976 – Kyocera
Corp starts production of Silicon ribbon crystal solar modules.
1977 – US
Dept. of Energy establishes US Solar Energy Research Institute in Golden, CO.
This organization currently known as
NREL, the National Renewable Energy Laboratories.
1990 – Germany
launches $500MM “100,000 Solar Roofs” program. The German’s spent the hard
money when solar panels were still very expensive.
1994 – Japan
starts “70,000 Solar Roofs” PV subsidy program.
2006 – The
CA PUC launches the California Solar Initiative (CSI). A $3 billion solar
subsidy program spanning 10 years.
2007 – The
CSI program starts. Well received by the market, with higher than expected
2008 – The
Energy Policy Act of 2005 (P.L. 109-58) created a 30 percent investment tax
credit (ITC). For commercial and residential solar energy systems. Applicable
January 1, 2006, through December 31,
2007. Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006 (P.L. 109-432) extended credits
one more year in December 2006. In 2007, global investment in clean energy
topped $100 billion. Solar energy leads
clean energy technology for venture capital and private equity investment. The
solar tax credits helped to create growth in the U.S. solar industry from
2006-2007. Solar electric capacity installations doubled in 2007 compared to
2006. The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (P.L. 110-343) added an eight-year extension. Covering commercial and
residential solar ITC. This eliminated the monetary cap for residential solar
electric installations. Companies and utilities paying the alternative minimum
tax (AMT) qualified for the credit. In 2009, American Recovery and Reinvestment
Act (P.L. 111-5) removed credit cap. The $2,000
credit cap on solar hot water installations no longer existed. This 30% Federal
Tax credit renewed until 2016.
2008 – 2012
– Stronger subsidies in Germany and new subsidy programs in Spain, Italy, and Australia. The cost of PV modules
falls from approximately $5 per watt to the $1 per watt level.
2010 – 2013
– Chinese manufacturing companies start to build large automated solar cell.
Also, solar module production factories. This further reduced the cost of
modules down towards $.70 per watt.
2012 – 2015
– Residential solar installations became cost effective for average American
households. In 2015, more solar powers installed at home in the US over 18 months than in all the cumulative
history before this.
May 2015 –
The Tesla Motor Company announces product launch of a lithium-ion battery storage. Price point would make it economic for
ordinary American householders. Providing ability to store solar power
generated during the day for use at night.
Dec 2015 –
The US Congress passed an 8-year extension to the 30% Federal Income Tax
Credit. Ensures the continued growth and adoption of photovoltaic solar power
systems in America.
How does Solar Energy work?
Our Sun is a naturally
occurring nuclear reactor. It releases tiny packets of energy called photons.
These photons travel 93 million miles from the sun to Earth. This only takes
about eight-and-a-half minutes. Every hour, enough photons hit our planet to
meet global energy needs for an entire year. Yet, solar-generated power in the
United States accounts for 0.4% of the total energy consumed. As solar
technology is improving, costs are dropping. Our ability to harness the sun’s
surplus of energy is on the rise. A report from International Energy Agency
states a big change by 2050. Solar energy could become the largest global
source of electricity.
In the coming years, everyone will enjoy the benefits. As solar-generated electricity grows more popular every day.
PV solar panels
solar panels are made up of many solar cells. Solar cells are made of silicon,
like semiconductors. They are constructed with a positive layer and a negative
layer, which together create an electric field, just like in a battery. When
photons hit a solar cell, they knock electrons loose from their atoms. If
conductors are attached to the positive and negative sides of a cell, it forms
an electrical circuit. When electrons flow through such a circuit, they
generate electricity. Multiple cells make up a solar panel, and multiple panels
(modules) can be wired together to form a solar array. The more panels you can
deploy, the more energy you can expect to generate.
Basics of electricity
PV solar panels are built of many solar cells. We use silicon to make Solar cells, like semiconductors. They are constructed with a positive layer and a negative layer. Both layers come together to create an electric field, like in a battery. When photons hit a solar cell, they knock electrons loose from their atoms. We can form an electric circuit by attaching a conductor to both positive and negative sides of a cell. When electrons flow through such a circuit, they generate electricity. Many cells make up a solar panel. We create a solar array by wiring many panels (modules) together. The more panels you can deploy, the more energy you can expect to generate.
Alternating current is
one form of electricity, also known as AC. This is when electrons are pushed
and pulled, reversing direction. This exchange is much like the cylinder of a
car’s engine. Generators create AC electricity when a coil of wire is spun next
to a magnet. Many different energy sources can “turn the handle” of this
generator. Examples include gas or diesel fuel, hydroelectricity, nuclear,
coal, wind, or solar.
The U.S. electrical
power grid chose AC electricity. It is less expensive to transmit over long
distances. Yet, solar panels create DC electricity. The only way to get DC
electricity into the AC grid is by using an inverter.
A solar inverter takes
the DC electricity from the solar array. It then uses that to create AC
electricity. Inverters are like the brains of the system. Not only do they
invert DC to AC power. They also provide ground fault protection. Provide
system stats including voltage and current on AC and DC circuits. As well as
stats on energy production, and largest power point tracking.
Central inverters have
dominated the solar industry since the beginning. One of the biggest technology
shifts in the PV industry was the introduction of micro-inverters. These
inverters optimize for each individual solar
panel. Rather than an entire solar system, as central inverters do. This
enables every solar panel to perform at maximum potential. One solar panel will
not drag down the performance of the entire solar array. In contrast, central
inverters optimize for the weakest link.
Putting it all together
Here is an example of
how a residential solar energy installation works. First, sunlight hits the
solar panel or PV array on the roof. The panels convert the energy to DC
current. This flows to the inverter. The inverter changes the solar DC power in
240V AC. This is suitable for your household appliances and feeding into the
grid. Your home uses electricity from the solar PV modules first. Any
additional demand is supplied from the Grid. A meter measures your electricity
production and consumption. Any excess is exported to the electricity Grid.
The above example
illustrates the basic idea of solar energy in the home. At this point, there
may be a few questions. What happens if you are not at home to use the electricity
the solar panels generate every sunny day? What happens at night when the solar
system is not generating power in real time?
One way to solve this
is to store the solar-generated energy
for later use. If there is no home battery installed, the energy will flow back
into the grid. But don’t worry, you still benefit from a system called “net metering”. This is the other solution.
A grid-tied PV system
has no batteries. Neighbors will receive any
excess power generated that is not used. This is known as “back
feeding” the grid. At night, the grid will provide energy for lights and
other appliances as usual. This covers solar users in exchange for the excess
energy they shared with the grid during the day. A net meter records the energy
sent compared to the energy received from the grid.
Now over 20,000
megawatts of solar electric capacity is operating in the United States. Around
650,000 homes and businesses have now gone solar.
In 2014, every two-and-a-half
minutes a new solar project was installed. Projections say solar capacity will
double in the next two years. Solar energy is the wave of the future. The sun
belongs to everyone. Anyone can enjoy the freedom solar power systems provides.
We need to commit to unlocking its vast energy.
It all starts with a single solar cell.
How much energy can you get from solar electricity?
The map above shows
the average amount of solar power produced each day from each state of the USA.
Each number corresponds to the amount of kWh produced by the 1-kilowatt solar power system. As you can see the amount of
electricity varies depending on your location. It also varies by the season and
so the estimates given in the map above are annual averages.
Please note that these
numbers are averages for the whole state. Some parts of some states have
different climatic conditions. These numbers may not reflect when you live necessarily.
Across the USA daily
production per kilowatt installed varies. From as little as 2.9 kWh per kW
per day to almost to 4.7 kWh in very
The amount of
electricity produced by each kW of solar
you install will vary. This will depend on the level of solar irradiation that
falls on your home or business. Solar irradiation is often measured in Sun
Hours. Meteorologists measure Sun Hours in megajoules.
Measuring total amount of irradiation in an area in each day. Next, they calculate complete hours compared to
an area with 1000 megajoules per square
meter on an area.
For example, if there were 500 megajoules
falling on average over a 12 hour day then the Sun Hours would be 6.
These numbers may be
confusing but are important. They relate to the output of solar panels. Solar
panels are rated based on the power they produce. Per 1000 megajoules per square meter of irradiation
falling on them.
Sun Hours measure
irradiation. With this number, we can
work out the actual amount of power we will produce. Real world solar power
systems do produce less than their rated output.
The factors that
reduce power rating include:
inefficiency – most inverters will lose 3-5% of electricity when converting
from DC to AC
Losses – small amounts of power lost through resistance in the cables
Dirt – dirt, and grime on solar panels will reduce
their real world performance.
losses – solar panels are rated based on what they produce at 25 degrees
celsius. As the cells in solar panels get hotter there is more resistance to
the flow of electrons across the cells. Their power output reduces compared to
when they are at a lower temperature. Even with the same level of irradiation.
Overall, total losses
due to these derating factors will generally be between 20-30%. Yet, when we
are working out the real world power of a system we usually use a derating
factor of around 25%.
Please note when using
the map above, estimates assume a perfect installation. Positioned due south,
at an optimal tilt angle, and unshaded.
Pros and Cons for Solar Energy
Below are the advantages and disadvantages of
installing solar panels on your home.
Advantages of Solar Energy
Marginal cost of generation is zero
Once the capital cost
of installing a solar power system has returned, the energy is free. This is
the most significant attraction for American homeowners. The only remaining
question is how long the payback period will last. When comparing, it is
possible this is a better deal than other ways to invest money.
Most homeowners are
more interested in financial aspects of installing this system. Rather than the
Insurance against rising power prices
Current solar panels
have a year life of at least 25 years. By installing a solar power system on
you home, you lock in a price for energy during this period. First, you need to
calculate how much energy the solar panels will produce. Next, you can get an
accurate price quote calculating each kilowatt-hour over the next 25 years.
Many consumers are now able to get a Levelized
cost of energy of $0.10 per kilowatt-hour. Next work out your average amount to
pay for power over the next 25 years. Once your quote is available, you can
compare the savings.
The average consumer
with a $150 per month power bill can see savings in the range of $30,000 over
the life of a solar system. At the beginning, the monthly savings are not huge.
This may only be $50 per month but in the 25th year, it can reach savings of up
to $300 per month.
Solar energy is a
renewable energy source. NASA estimates that the sun will shine for another 6.5
billion years. This means that solar energy is abundant, and will never run out
in our lifetime. The surface of the earth receives 120,000 terawatts of solar
radiation (sunlight). This is 20,000 times more power than what needed to supply
the entire world.
energy does not generally cause pollution. There are some emissions during
production and installation of solar energy equipment. These emissions are
minimal when compared to generating electricity from fossil fuels. An
Australian government research body (The CSIRO) estimates energy payback is 1.5
years. This means it takes a solar panel 1.5 years to generate the amount of
power it took to make it. These numbers are from a statistic back in 2009. It
is likely a lot quicker payback now. As solar panels last 25 years, this is
Geographically widely available
The level of solar
irradiation that falls upon the earth varies with the geography of the planet.
Generally, the closer to the equator the more accessible solar energy is. What
most do not realize is that solar energy
is available anywhere.
In the sunniest parts
of America, a solar system will produce on average 4.7 kWh of power per 1
kilowatt of solar panels.
The least sunny areas
are different, such as in the mountains and northeast. In this area, it will
produce 2.9-kilowatt hours per kilowatt, per day. Some areas are better than others
are. For solar power, it is still viable in almost all locations.
Reduces Electricity Costs
Two schemes have been
recently introduced net metering and feed-in tariff (FIT) schemes. Homeowners
can now “sell” excess electricity or receive bill credits. This is
possible during times a home produces more electricity than consumed. This means
that homeowners can reduce their electricity expenses by going solar.
www.solar-estimate.org show that adding solar panels can bring big savings.
Annual savings of well above $1000 per year in many states.
residents save on average $28,000 after 20 years! The availability of solar
finance options has made it more affordable and available. Through Solar PPA
agreements and zero down loans.
Community Solar can be used to
overcome installation issues
Many American homes
are unfit for solar panels. Due to shading, insufficient space and ownership
With the introduction
of shared solar, homeowners can subscribe to “community solar
gardens”. With this approach, your
own rooftop does not need any solar panels. the community generates the solar
Installation costs of
many panels installed on vacant land are
cheaper. This is a great advantage.
With this approach, Legislation is a need. This enables
installations of community solar in each state. This has been available for
some time now, but only started to arrive in California and New York.
No moving Parts means no noise and
Solar panel systems
have no moving parts. Also, there is no noise from the PV technology. When
compared to other renewable technologies, solar wins in this category. One
alternative like wind turbines has moving parts and causes noise pollution.
Financial Support from
In December 2015, the
US Senate passed an extension of the 30%
Renewable Tax Credit. This federal incentive extended the tax credit for a
further 8 year.
There are also rebates
available in some jurisdictions. Available at either the state, county or
utility company level.
Technology is improving
Technology is always developing new advancements. This includes the design and manufacture of solar power equipment. Solar cells are becoming more efficient at turning solar energy into electricity. The amount of space required to generate a specific amount of solar power is reducing. As the popularity of solar increases, so will the dramatic advances. Improvements are incremental. Nothing revolutionary yet, but the future is bright.
Disadvantages of Solar Energy
High Capital Cost
Most people understand
that solar power is expensive. This is one of the most debatable topics on the
entire solar energy pros and cons list. Politics is the driving forces behind
the development of solar energy.
Solar power received
government subsidies. Yet, oil and coal industries have also been subsidized.
In 2010, coal received
$1,189 billion in federal subsidies. Coal also received support for electricity
production. Meanwhile, solar is not far behind at $968 billion.
Nowadays, the best
solar panels can be cheaper than buying electricity.
Solar energy is an intermittent
There are three
aspects to the intermittent nature of solar power:
does not shine at night meaning solar panels do not generate power at night.
shines with different intensity. This changes based on location and time of
year. Also, each day the sun shines at different times.
cover can have a significant effect on the amount of energy produced by solar
In the past, all these
factors have meant that solar power is unreliable. It is a risk if relied on
for baseload or for mission critical
This is now changing.
Tesla Motors announced last year a new product to solve this issue. A Lithium
Ion battery for the home. This solution will allow consumers to cost-effectively store solar power energy.
Energy Storage is Expensive
Energy storage systems
such as batteries will help smoothen out demand and load. This will make solar
power more stable, but these technologies are currently expensive.
Looking at the
numbers, we are fortunate. There is a good relation between our access to solar
and energy demand. Our electricity peaks in the middle of the day. That is the
same time there is a lot of sunlight!
Associated with Pollution
While solar power is
less polluting than fossil fuels, some problems do exist. There are some
greenhouse gas emissions associated with some manufacturing processes. Nitrogen
trifluoride and sulfur hexafluoride are
the talked about ones. The production of solar panels has found traces of these.
These are some of the
most potent greenhouse gasses. Having
many, thousand times the impact on global warming compared to carbon dioxide.
Transportation and installation of solar power systems can also cause
The lesson of the day
is: There is nothing that is completely risk-free in the energy world. Yet,
solar power is most favorable when
compared with all other technologies.
Certain solar cells
need materials that are expensive and rare in nature. This is especially true
for thin-film solar cells. Based on either cadmium telluride (CdTe) or copper
indium gallium selenide (CIGS).
Power density is also
called watt per square meter (W/m2). Used when looking at how much power an
energy source has in a certain area. In this case, we are looking at real
estate. Low power density means we need more real estate to get the power we
demand at a good price. The global mean power density for solar radiation is
170 W/m². This is more than any other renewable energy source. But it cannot
compare to oil, gas and nuclear power. Not yet anyway.
Solar doesn’t move house
One disadvantage with
installing solar panels on your home is that it is expensive to move. If you
move house, it is not easy to bring it with you. The net metering agreement
with your utility is fixed to the property.
Yet, in practice,
solar panels add value to a home. If you do move, you are likely to see the
value of your investment in solar panels reflected in a higher sale price. The
easiest way, in this case, is to buy the
solar panels outright. With a lease or PPA,
you need the new owner to agree to take over the agreement. That can be tricky.
China’s Chang’e-4 mission has literally sown the first seeds for future lunar living by managing to sprout cotton seeds it carried with it to the far side of the moon.
Images beamed back by Chang’e-4 and released by the Advanced Technology Research Institute at Chongqing University clearly show small green shoots that have sprouted through a grid-like structure inside a canister in which the experimental cotton seeds are housed.
Although the probe has also carried with it seeds for potato, rockcress, and rape plant, these were the only seeds that have sprouted so far; it remains to be seen when, or if, the others follow suit.
The lunar lander has also carried with it some experimental silkworm eggs, fruit fly pupae, and yeast.
While similar experiments have been successfully carried out on the International Space Station, this is the first time seed of any kind has sprouted on the moon, which is being seen as a significant step towards sustaining extended space missions where the ability to grow plants will come in super handy.
“This is the first time humans have done biological growth experiments on the lunar surface,” said Xie Gengxin, who led the design of the experiment, on Tuesday (Jan 15).
Cotton seeds carried by China’s lunar lander have begun to grow on the far side of the moon, laying the foundation for human settlement. pic.twitter.com/xxQPRMmWgV
Earlier this year, in a never-before-attempted mission, the China National Space Administration (CNSA) soft-landed a robotic probe, the Chang’e-4, in a crater within a crater on the far side of the moon.
The spacecraft made a picture-perfect touch down in the Von Karman Crater – a huge southern hemisphere impact crater, measuring about 112 miles (180 kilometers) in diameter, located within an even bigger impact crater – the 1,600-mile (2,500-kilometer) South Pole-Aitken Basin.
Although Chang’e-4 had made it to the Moon’s orbit four days after launch, it began its final descent about three weeks later from an elliptical landing orbit almost 10 miles above the lunar surface.
When it was 100 meters above the landing site, the spacecraft briefly paused in its vertical approach, hovering over the landing zone to survey the topography below and selecting a relatively flat spot before resuming its descent.
The impeccable touchdown was appreciated by NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine, who congratulated the mission team on “a successful landing on the far side of the Moon,” calling it “a first for humanity and an impressive accomplishment.”
The final approach phases were achieved autonomously by the spacecraft, as remote intervention from mission control in China was not possible during this stage of the mission.
“This is a great technological accomplishment as it was out of sight of Earth, so signals are relayed back by their orbiter, and most of the landing was actually done autonomously in difficult terrain,” Prof. Andrew Coates of UCL Mullard Space Science Laboratory (MSSL) in Surrey, England, was quoted by The Guardian as saying.
“The landing was almost vertical because of the surrounding hills,” Prof. Coates added.
Soon after landing, Chang’e-4 deployed its lunar rover named “Yutu-2” – Chinese for “Jade Rabbit-2” – which sent back the first ever close-up shot of the mysterious far side of our only known natural satellite.
The Chinese space agency also shared an image of Yutu-2’s deployment, along with pre- and post-landing images, all of which were relayed through the Queqiao (Magpie Bridge) satellite orbiting at the Earth-moon Lagrange point 2 beyond the far side.
Queqiao was, in fact, launched in May last year for the exact same purpose because direct communication with the far side of the Moon is impossible, what with the Moon’s entire mass blocking the exchange of direct signals to and from Earth.
While humans have glimpsed, and even mapped, the lunar far side in the past – thanks to NASA’s Apollo 8 mission half a century ago and the Soviet Luna 3 mission a decade prior to that – no spacecraft had ever touched down on the untrodden ground, until Chang’e-4 changed all of that.
In the past decade. or so, China has made rapid advances in space technology and is the only country in the world to have soft-landed a space vehicle on the Moon since the then Soviet Union’s 1976 Luna 24 mission to retrieve samples Moon soil.
China achieved the feat in December 2013, landing its Chang’e-3 rover on Mare Imbrium – a vast lava plain within the Imbrium Basin on the near side of the Moon, becoming only the third country after Russia and the United States to achieve a lunar touchdown.
Encouraged by Chang’e-3’s success, China stepped up its lunar program for an even bigger mission, the first phase of which came to a successful conclusion with Chang’e-4’s Thursday landing on the targeted far side.
Comprising of a lander and a small rover, Chang’e-4 was, in fact, a backup spacecraft manufactured with the Chang’e-3.
It was only in 2015 that China announced its plans of using the spare space vehicle to launch something so complex that it had never been attempted before.
The nearly four-metric-ton Chang’e-4 has carried with it eight scientific instruments – four each on the lander and the rover.
The lander is equipped with the Landing Camera (LCAM), the Terrain Camera (TCAM), the Low-Frequency Spectrometer (LFS), and the Lunar Lander Neutrons and Dosimetry (LND).
And, the rover is carrying the Panoramic Camera (PCAM), the Lunar Penetrating Radar (LPR), the Visible and Near-Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (VNIS), and the Advanced Small Analyzer for Neutrals (ASAN).
As mentioned, Chang’e-4 also carried with it a small experimental payload of silkworm eggs, fruit fly pupae and yeast, in addition to seeds for potato, rockcress, rape plant, and cotton to check how they develop in the inhospitable lunar environment.
The huge amounts of scientific data and information that the spacecraft’s state-of-the-art instruments are capable of garnering will go a long way in helping researchers understand why the far side of our Moon is so vastly different from the side we’re familiar with.
For example, the lunar terrain on the tidally-locked near side is largely dark basaltic plains called the lunar maria, while the far side is mountainous and rugged and, hence, difficult to land anything on.
Since the Moon takes the same amount of time (28 days) to orbit our planet as it does to rotate once on its axis, we always get to see the same side of the natural satellite, with the opposite side forever hidden from view.
“Since the far side of the moon is shielded from electromagnetic interference from the Earth, it’s an ideal place to research the space environment and solar bursts, and the probe can ‘listen’ to the deeper reaches of the cosmos,” CNSA’s deputy director for the Lunar Exploration and Space Program Center, Tongjie Liu, was quoted by CNN as saying.
China’s next lunar run will be the Chang’e-5 sample-retrieval mission, which CNSA started preparing for in October 2014 when it launched the Chang’e-5T1 mission to run atmospheric re-entry tests on the -4Chang’e-5 capsule.
“Experts are still discussing and verifying the feasibility of subsequent projects, but it’s confirmed that there will be another three missions after Chang’e 5,” said Wu Yanhua, deputy head of the China National Space Administration (CNSA), at a press conference.
Two NASA interns and a team of amateur astronomers have discovered a new exoplanet roughly twice the size of Earth while gleaning through data captured by the U.S. space agency’s now-defunct Kepler space telescope.
Although the so-called “Super Earth” was first spotted by the “citizen scientists,” using information gathered by the Kepler space telescope during Campaign 4 of its extended K2 “Second Light” mission back in 2015, the data was discarded as unreliable due to issues with two of Kepler’s reaction wheels.
The same team analyzed the Campaign 4 data a second time and uploaded the re-processed information on Exoplanet Explorers – a new Zooniverse project open to public searches of Kepler’s K2 observations to locate new transiting planets – in 2017.
To cut a long story short, mistakes were made but follow-up observations, using data from the Keck Observatory in Hawaii, NASA’s Infrared Telescope – also in Hawaii, the agency’s Spitzer Space Telescope, and European Space Agency’s (ESA’s) Gaia space observatory, allowed the team to confirm the existence of K2-288Bb at the 233rd American Astronomical Society meeting in Seattle on January 7, 2019.
“It’s a very exciting discovery due to how it was found, its temperate orbit and because planets of this size seem to be relatively uncommon,” said Adina Feinstein, a graduate student at the University of Chicago, Illinois, and the lead author of the study paper due to be published in The Astronomical Journal.
“It took the keen eyes of citizen scientists to make this extremely valuable find and point us to it,” Feinstein said.
Officially known as K2-288Bb, the exoplanet is possibly a rocky, or a gas-rich planet along the lines of Neptune.
It is located in the habitable zone, also known as “Goldilocks’ zone,” of a binary star system of the same name minus the suffix “b” in the constellation Taurus some 226 lightyears away from Earth.
The binary stellar system K2-288B, which K2-288Bb is a part of, contains two dim stars about 5.1 billion miles (8.2 billion kilometers) apart.
The larger and brighter of the two stars is about half the mass and size of our own Sun, while its stellar companion is about one-third of our Sun’s mass and girth.
However, it’s the lesser of the two stars that K2-288Bb orbits once every 31.3 Earth-days.
Simply put, an exoplanet is a planet that does not orbit our Sun but belongs to a different planetary system and orbits the star (sun) of that particular system.
They are also referred to as extrasolar planets; aptly so because they’re not part of our Solar System.
An exoplanet is named after the star of the system to which it belongs with a lower case letter added to the name as a suffix.
The first exoplanet discovered in the system gets the suffix ‘b’, with subsequent discoveries getting the letters c, d, e, and so forth, in the order they are found.
That is why the new exoplanet is named K2-288Bb – the ‘b’ at the end being the suffix for the first planet discovered in the stellar system K2-288B.
To give another example, TRAPPIST-1, an ultra-cool dwarf star in the constellation Aquarius, 39 light-years away from the Earth, has ten known exoplanets
Hence, based on the aforementioned naming methodology, the seven latest discoveries, starting from the planet closest to the star, are named TRAPPIST-1b, TRAPPIST-1c, TRAPPIST-1d, TRAPPIST-1e, TRAPPIST-1f, TRAPPIST-1g, and TRAPPIST-1h.
The letter ‘a’ by default goes to the parent star, though not shown with the name.
Habitable Zone (Goldilocks’ Zone)
An planet or exoplanet is said to be in the habitable zone of a planetary system when it is orbiting at an ideal distance from the system’s star/sun to potentially support life of any kind – not too close to the star to be too hot to support water formation, neither too far for water to be in a permanent freeze.
Kepler Space Observatory
Named after the astronomer, Johannes Kepler, the Kepler space observatory had been in an “Earth-trailing heliocentric orbit” ever since its launch in March 2009 as part of NASA’s program to discover Earth-sized exoplanets.
After nine years of service to science and space research, Kepler was decommissioned by the space agency on October 30, 2018.
The spacecraft was designed to scan an area of the galaxy in the vicinity of our own solar system to identify Earth-like exoplanets in and around the ‘habitable zones’ of their planetary systems.
Equipped with a photometer that continuously monitored the brightness of over 145,000 main sequence stars in a fixed field of view, Kepler beamed the collected data back to Earth for analysis.
The method involved detecting the periodic dimming which happens when exoplanets cross in front of their host star – similar to the Eclipse concept.
Due to noise interference in the data from the stars as well as the spacecraft, the mission was supposed to be extended till 2016 in order to achieve all mission targets.
However, built to endure the harsh space conditions for a maximum of 3.5 years, Kepler ran into trouble on July 14, 2012, when one of the four reaction wheels of the craft stopped turning.
Incident-free functioning of the three remaining reaction wheels was now critical to the completion of the mission but fate would have it differently.
On May 11, 2013, the continuation of the mission was seriously jeopardized when a second reaction wheel stopped working.
NASA failed in its attempt to fix the two out-of-commission reaction wheels, publicly throwing in the towel on August 15, 2013, with an announcement to the effect.
The agency then appealed to the space science community for alternative plans for continuing the search for exoplanets using the two working reaction wheels and thrusters.
The K2 “Second Light” proposal, which involved using the limited capabilities of the handicapped Kepler to track habitable planets around smaller and dimmer red dwarfs, was made in Nov 2013, getting NASA’s official nod in May 2014.
Since then until its demise, the space telescope’s had surveyed and cataloged hundreds of new planetary candidates.
It’s all systems go at the CES 2019, which kicked off today (Jan 8) at the Las Vegas Convention Center – the regular venue for the Consumer Electronics Show since 1998 – and will last until Jan 11.
Some four and a half thousand companies, including a number of start-ups, will be displaying their technological wares at the four-day event, ranging from the smartest of televisions, laptops and mobile phones to self-driving cars, smart home products and everything else in between.
Historically, the event has been about consumer gadgets, with manufacturers showcasing their latest and upcoming products at this increasingly popular global stage.
However, over the years the annual event has diversified extensively and now encompasses the artificial intelligence, virtual reality, automobiles, medicine and even marketing and agriculture.
While the big guns of technology always pull something new out of their bags of tricks every year, it has become a kind of a trend to hold back flagship products for standalone events; the Google Pixel 3 event in New York last October is a case in point.
Here are some of the main tech takeaways from day one of this mega event.
HTC unveils two new Vive VR headsets
Taiwanese tech giant HTC revealed two brand new virtual reality headsets – the Vive Cosmos and the Vive Pro Eye, each targeting a different set of customers.
While the Vive Cosmos has been designed as a consumer-first VR headset with virtual reality enthusiasts in mind, the Vive Pro Eye, as the name suggests, is intended for professionals in the business segment.
The Vive Cosmos will not only play games but will also offer new social experiences; plus it will be compatible with HTC’s new Viveport Infinity game subscription platform.
The Vive Pro Eye’s integrated eye-tracking technology will afford greater accessibility and improved training simulations to the professional user, while its updated CPU and GPU promises a more efficient performance compared to the previous-gen pro headset.
HP OMEN X Emperium 65 Big Format Gaming Display
While HP has unveiled a whole range of new devices at this year’s CES, what stood out among them was its all-new Big Format Gaming Display (BFGD), the OMEN X Emperium.
The OMEN X Emperium 65 is one of the world’s first BFGDs with a 120W soundbar and much more.
The idea behind big format gaming displays is to provide a TV-sized 4K gaming experience with features like top-of-the-line HDR, a high variable refresh rate, and SHIELD TV functionality.
The HP OMEN X Emperium 65 features a DisplayHDR 1000-certified 64.5-inch 8-bit AMVA display panel with a screen resolution of 3840×2160 pixels.
Some of the other features of the HP big format gaming display include:
120 – 144 Hz refresh rate (normal/overclocked)
750-1,000 nits brightness (typical/HDR)
3200:1 – 4000:1 contrast ratio (minimum/typical)
178° viewing angles
4 ms GtG response time with overdrive enabled
384-zone full direct-array backlight for an enhanced HDR experience
HP OMEN X Emperium 65 is expected to go on sale sometime next month and although the price has not been revealed yet, it’s expected to set you back by quite a bit.
Asus ROG Mothership
The Asus ROG Mothership is a powerful detachable gaming laptop, which at first glance looks strikingly similar to the Microsoft Surface Pro.
The device boasts high-end specs like a 17.3-inch FHD IPS display with a 144Hz refresh rate, Intel Core i9 processor, Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080, up to 64GB RAM, and much more.
The 4.7-kilogram Mothership is equipped with a Kickstand that kicks out automatically as soon as the bottom edge touches the surface you’re placing it on, and what’s more is that it allows you to sit the display at three different angles.
The gaming device also features a three NVMe SSD RAID 0 array for top-speed file operations and offers advanced connectivity via an 802.11ax Wi-Fi (aka Wi-Fi 6) and 2.5G Ethernet.
Two of the biggest Huawei announcements at CES 2019 were the ultraportable 13-inch Huawei MateBook 13 laptop and the Huawei MediaPad M5 Lite, a 10-inch Android-based tablet.
The MateBook 13 packs some great specs, including a 2,160×1080-pixel high-res touchscreen display, an Intel 8th generation Core i7 or Core i5 processor with up to of 8GB RAM and up to 256GB of onboard storage.
The laptop also has two USB Type-C ports, a one-megapixel web camera, a fingerprint scanner on the power button, and a 3.5mm headphone jack.
The Huawei MediaPad Android tablet is powered by a Kirin 659 processor and offers 3GB of RAM, 32GB internal storage, a microSD slot, a 7,500mAh battery, and a stylus.
Hyundai’s “Walking Car”
Enough of laptops and VR headsets; here’s a potential life-saving creation that will make a huge difference to how rescue teams respond to emergencies, particularly in areas that are inaccessible by wheeled vehicles.
It’s a Hyundai-developed concept vehicle called “Elevate” that actually walks on articulated legs and, hence, makes it easier to reach victims of natural disasters, especially where flood, fire, or earthquake has rendered the terrain inaccessible by regular wheeled transportation.
Not only can this walking car prototype walk, but, terrain permitting, it can also drive like a normal car using the wheels attached to each of its legs.
“When a tsunami or earthquake hits, current rescue vehicles can only deliver first responders to the edge of the debris field,” said John Suh, VP and head of Hyundai’s Center for Robotic-Augmented Design in Living Experiences (CRADLE).
“They have to go the rest of the way by foot,” he said, adding: “Elevate can drive to the scene and climb right over flood debris or crumbled concrete.”
With some 20,000 near-Earth asteroids and comets orbiting the Sun, NASA and other space agencies have been constantly tracking these near-Earth objects (NEOs) since the 1990s in a joint initiative called ‘Spaceguard.”
However, merely chasing these potential threats is not going to save Earth from another mass extinction and, probably, thousands of years of ice age, should one of them slam into us.
The good news is that NASA has been working on a planetary-defense mission called DART, an acronym for Double Asteroid Redirection Test, to save us from exactly such an eventuality.
DART is essentially an impactor spacecraft that NASA plans to crash into an asteroid satellite at 13,500 miles per hour in an effort to change its course.
The idea is to find out how much the car-sized impactor can change the trajectory of the flying space rock and whether it’s enough to redirect an Earth-bound asteroid safely away from us.
The space rock that NASA has in its crosshairs for the planned Oct 2022 smash-up is, in fact, a satellite moonlet nicknamed Didymoon, about seven million miles away from Earth.
The moonlet, which is about 150 meters across, orbits an 800-meter-wide asteroid called Didymos, from where it gets its nickname.
While Didymoon is not on a collision course with Earth and poses no threat to us whatsoever, a detailed study of the space object and then slamming into it to bump it off its bearings should provide the DART team with useful data that can come in handy in averting a real asteroid threat if ever it comes to that.
Speaking to Space.com at the annual meeting of the American Geophysical Union, Nancy Chabot – a planetary scientist at Johns Hopkins University’s Applied Physics Laboratory and project scientist for DART – said that “science-driven” space missions were largely focused on understanding the origins of our solar system and its building blocks, but planetary defense was all “about the present solar system and what are we going to do in the present.”
Chabot says that tracking the moonlet and knowing its exact location, instead of having a ballpark idea of its whereabouts, is going to be crucial to the mission because the DART team wants to hit it head-on for maximum impact.
“It’s interesting because it’s a space mission, but the telescopes are such a huge, important part of the mission succeeding,” Chabot told space news website.
“We have to know where this moon is in order to impact it, to make this maximum deflection,” she said.
“We kind of take for granted that we know where everything is at all times,” she continued
“We understand where the system is as a whole, but specifically where that moon’s gonna be [requires tracking] because we want to try to hit it head-on,” Chabot added.
However, at least ten to twenty years’ advance warning will be needed to pull off something like redirecting a huge asteroid in a real-threat scenario, according to Chabot.
She says that “the idea of a kinetic impactor is definitely not like [the movie] ‘Armageddon,’ where you go up at the last hour and you know, save the Earth.”
She adds: “This is something that you would do five, 10, 15, 20 years in advance — gently nudge the asteroid so it just sails merrily on its way and doesn’t impact the Earth.”
The 14 radar images below, captured by the Arecibo Observatory radio telescope in Puerto Rico in November 2003, show Didymos (65803) and its moonlet.
If all goes according to plan, the mission will launch as early as June 2021, with an expected collision date in Oct 2022, as mentioned earlier.
While ground telescopes will track the new course of the twin objects post-impact, an Italian Space Agency CubeSat called Light Italian CubeSat for Imaging of Asteroids will accompany DART on its mission to keep an eye on proceedings.
Additionally, as part of an international Asteroid Impact Deflection Assessment (AIDA) mission, the European Space Agency (ESA) will launch two CubeSats, APEX (Asteroid Prospection Explorer) and Juventas, onboard the agency’s Hera spacecraft, in time to reach the binary asteroid system sometime in 2026 to record the effects of the DART collision, according to NASA.
“To test potential techniques in “deflecting” an asteroid – one of the preferred methods for mitigating a threat – DART will travel to the Didymos binary asteroid system via its a xenon-based electric propulsion system, steering with an onboard camera and sophisticated autonomous navigation software,” says the U.S. space agency.
DART is expected to send back a close-up shot of the Didymoon surface – its last transmission to Earth – before it is pulverized into space dust.
For any Solar System body to qualify as a near-Earth object, its closest approach to the Sun has to be less than 1.3 astronomical units (AU), the equivalent of nearly 121 million miles.
Among the 20,000 near-Earth asteroids and comets orbiting the Sun is a 500-meter-wide asteroid called Bennu, which has a 1-in-2,700 chance of smashing into Earth sometime between 2175 and 2196, say scientists.
The potentially hazardous object (PHO), “listed on the Sentry Risk Table with the second-highest cumulative rating on the Palermo Technical Impact Hazard Scale,” is currently 54 million miles from Earth.
The Sun-orbiting asteroid has been in NASA’s crosshairs ever since its discovery by the Lincoln Near-Earth Asteroid Research (LINEAR) project in 1999.
So focussed has the space agency been on Bennu that in 2016 it sent its ORISIS-REx (Origins, Spectral Interpretation, Resource Identification, Security, Regolith Explorer) spacecraft to the asteroid on a sample-return mission.
After traveling through space for more than two years, the spacecraft finally reached the proximity of Bennu last month.
Over the coming months, the NASA spaceship will map the asteroid to identify the best possible sample-collection site before making a slow descent to the surface to collect samples using its robotic arm.
OSIRIS-REx will begin its return journey after it has safely tucked away its precious cargo of Bennu samples inside a Sample-Return Capsule (SRC).
The SRC is expected to re-enter Earth’s atmosphere and land at the U.S.
Air Force Utah Test and Training Range on Sep 24, 2023 – about a year after DART smashes into Didymoon, hopefully, achieving the desired results.
For all we know, Bennu might just turn out be the asteroid that NASA has to knock off-course to save the planet in the future; that’s when the knowledge gained from the DART mission will come in handy – unless the 500-meter flying rock hits us sooner.
Last week, a day after Apple lost $57 billion in market value, resulting from the plunge the company’s stocks took after it slashed its revenue forecast, U.S. President Donald Trump told reporters at a White House press conference that he was not really worried about it.
No, I’m not,” he said when a reporter asked him if he was concerned about the tech giant’s stock debacle.
“I mean, look, they’ve gone up a lot,” Trump said, adding, “You know, they’ve gone up hundreds of percent since [I’ve become] president.”
He also said: “Apple was at a number that was incredible, and they’re going to be fine.”
However, he did express his dissatisfaction with the fact that Apple continues to manufacture its products in China when making them at home was a better option, he thought, for the Cupertino-based company.
The US president probably doesn’t realize that moving iPhone production out of China is easier said than done.
Here’s what Dan Ives, Wedbush Managing Director of equity research, told CNN Business.
“Man could be on Mars before Apple is producing more of its iPhones in the United States, just from a supply chain cost perspective.”
In a letter to Apple investors, company CEO Tim Cook cited a number of reasons for the company’s modest projection for the last quarter, including, but not limited to, below par iPhone sales, US-China trade war, and its own reduced-price iPhone battery replacement scheme.
Although emerging markets, including China, were largely responsible for the year-over-year decline in iPhone revenue, iPhone upgrades in developed markets were also “not as strong as we thought they would be,” Cook wrote.
He added: “While macroeconomic challenges in some markets were a key contributor to this trend, we believe there are other factors broadly impacting our iPhone performance, including consumers adapting to a world with fewer carrier subsidies, US dollar strength-related price increases, and some customers taking advantage of significantly reduced pricing for iPhone battery replacements.”
Back to Trump and his soft Apple-bashing, the US president said that the Apple’s stock would have no bearing on the US economy because the iPhone company makes its products in China, something that the company has refuted.
“Apple is a great company. Look, I have to worry about our country,” he said at the press conference, adding, “Don’t forget, Apple makes the product in China.”
He wasn’t done yet, as he went on to say, “I told Tim Cook, who’s a friend of mine who I like a lot, make your product in the United States.”
If you are wondering whether or not his friendship with Cook is on a reciprocal basis, you’re not alone.
He added: “Build those big beautiful plants that go on for miles. Build those plants in the United States. I’d like that even better. Apple makes its product in China. China is the biggest beneficiary of Apple … because they build their product mostly in China.”
He had more to say.
“But now, [Cook is] investing $350 billion — because of what we did with taxes and the incentives that we created — in the United States,” Trump said. “He’s going to build a campus and lots of other places.”
He said his focus was on the nation and that he wanted Apple to make its iPhones and all of its other products in the United States, asserting that it “will take place.”
However, the $350 billion investment Trump is talking about is mostly going towards tax repatriation and to Apple suppliers, with a likelihood of less than ten percent of the amount ending up in investments in the country, according to a Politifact report last year after Trump first bragged about it.
As far as building campuses in the country is concerned, Apple did announce in December that it was planning to spend $1 billion to build a brand new campus in Austin, Texas, that would eventually employ 15,000 workers.
It is part of the company’s three-year expansion drive to build new facilities in Seattle, San Diego, Culver City, Pittsburgh, New York and Boulder, Colorado, with a strong likelihood of more such facilities coming up in other US cities in the longer term.
“Apple is proud to bring new investment, jobs and opportunity to cities across the United States and to significantly deepen our quarter-century partnership with the city and people of Austin,” company CEO, Tim Cook said in a Dec 13 press release.
“Talent, creativity and tomorrow’s breakthrough ideas aren’t limited by region or zip code, and, with this new expansion, we’re redoubling our commitment to cultivating the high-tech sector and workforce nationwide,” said the Apple CEO.
Apple was apparently living up to its January 2018 promise of generating employment for at least 20,000 people across the nation by 2023, having already created 6,000 jobs in the U.S. last year.
The Steve Jobs-founded company is looking to invest a whopping $10 billion in data centers across the country over the next five years, with plans of spending nearly half of it by the end of 2019.
Work is already underway to expand the company’s existing data centers in North Carolina, Arizona, and Nevada, in addition to a new 400,000-square-foot, state-of-the-art data center being planned for Waukee, Iowa, to boost its iMessage, Siri, the App Store, and other services in the country.